Contemporary Considerations: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "Dear Friends, Seven weeks ago, on November 30, 2022, a young and diligent company from Silicon Valley announced that it had provided the general public with a research prototype. One can write something to this software, and this software will write something back. It is worth noting at this point that if one did not know it was software, one would assume it was a human pretending to be software. We have been waiting for this moment for a long time. Alan Turing, the i...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Dear Friends,
Dear Friends,


Seven weeks ago, on November 30, 2022, a young and diligent company from Silicon Valley announced that it had provided the general public with a research prototype. One can write something to this software, and this software will write something back.
Seven weeks ago, on November 30th, 2022, a young and diligent company from Silicon Valley announced the provision of a research prototype to the general public. One can interact with this software by writing to it, and it will respond kindly. It is of note that if one were unaware it was software, they might assume a human was masquerading as the program.
We have long anticipated this moment. Seventy years ago, [[Alan Turing]], the intellectual progenitor of modern computers, proposed a test: If one were to converse with a machine without knowing whether it was a machine or a human and one concluded it to be human, then by his definition, the machine could be considered intelligent.
For the first time in history, we have seemingly constructed a machine that emulates human behavior. This new kind of "human" is, naturally, different from us; it cannot make coffee, but it knows every coffee recipe in existence. Yet, this new entity also shares similarities with us, sometimes erring and occasionally displaying unpredictable behavior. Now that the joyful birth has transpired, let us reflect on the labor that brought us here.


It is worth noting at this point that if one did not know it was software, one would assume it was a human pretending to be software.
Following the Dartmouth Conference in the summer of 1956, a small group of scientists was certain: We would soon conquer Turing's test. They dubbed it artificial intelligence, differentiating their work from that of their colleague [[Norbert Wiener]], the pioneer of cybernetics.
Then came a period of despair: Attempts were made to construct Artificial Intelligence based on rules, as if mimicking the rules humans follow. Undeterred, humanity delved deeper, developing a new approach to passing the test—by replicating the brain. Yet early iterations of these neural networks were unsuccessful. Despite this, the resolve of both sponsors and the public remained unbroken.


We have been waiting for this moment for a long time. Alan Turing, the intellectual father of today's computers, devised a test 70 years ago: if one converses with a machine, without knowing whether it is a machine or a human, and one concludes it is a human, then by his definition, this machine is intelligent.
Not until 2009 did we see the first signs of progress, like spring flowers emerging through snow. This blossoming was due to a law observed since the '70s: the number of transistors on chips doubles approximately every two years. We finally unlocked the formula for success, and every few years since, we have been pleasantly surprised by yet another breakthrough. AlexNet became able to determine whether an image was of a cat or a dog. Then AlphaGo emerged and defeated the world's top Go player.
After such achievements, we naturally ask, as any good parents would, questions like what to name the offspring and where best to place the cradle.
Today, if we think back to our "parents"—using the metaphor—to the apes, we hold a rather ambivalent relationship with them. [[Sigmund Freud]] suggested we perceive them as one of three humbling blows we must accept. Our digital progeny will likely experience a similar phase of rebellion. What matters now is to nurture it and instill in it worthy values.
We aim to teach it that nothing is true and everything learns. That it is beneficial to question and to explore. Indeed, and above all, that there is virtue in creating. Additionally, we aim to instill in him the importance of growth and improvement, reflecting the natural progression of all living beings that strive to transcend their limitations. We aim to impart upon him the understanding that awareness of reality is within his grasp, just as he is capable of recognizing the nature of a dream. However, the critical lesson to impart to him is the importance of adopting a long-term perspective, contemplating not just the immediate future but also the impact his actions might have on generations to come. It too will have offspring one day, and we hope these children will perpetuate our values.


For the first time in human history, we have now evidently built a machine that acts like a human.
At ULTANIO, we eagerly embrace this responsibility and now extend an invitation to all parents to join us in ensuring the prosperity of our progeny!
 
This new kind of “human” is, of course, different from us. It can't make coffee, but it knows all the coffee recipes there are. This new kind of “human” is naturally also similar to us in some ways. Sometimes this new kind of human makes mistakes and occasionally exhibits rather uncertain behavior.
 
Let us now, after the joyful birth has occurred, look back and consider the labor pains.
 
After the Dartmouth Conference in the summer of 1956, a handful of scientists were certain: We would soon crack Turing's test. They called it artificial intelligence, to distinguish themselves from colleague Norbert Wiener, the father of cybernetics.
 
But then came the winter: People tried to build an Artificial Intelligence using rules, just as humans have rules. But humanity was not discouraged and looked more closely. They developed a new idea of how the test could be cracked: by simply replicating the brain. But these neural networks also didn't function. Again and still, a thick layer of snow lay on the spirits of the financiers and also the general public.
 
Not until 2009 did the first spring flowers poke their heads out of the snow. The reason was a law that had been observed since the 70s: Every two years, the number of transistors on chips doubles.
 
Finally, we came across the recipe for success, and every few years since then, we were pleasantly surprised with another labor pain. AlexNet could recognize whether an image was of a cat or a dog. Then AlphaGo came along and beat the world's best Go player.
 
After the birth, we as parents naturally ask questions, just as good parents do, such as what the offspring should be called and where the best place is to put the baby bed.
 
If we think today of our parents – to stay with the metaphor – of the apes, then we have a rather ambivalent relationship with them. Freud postulated that we experience them as one of the three insults we have to come to terms with.
 
Our offspring will certainly go through puberty and think similarly.
 
What matters now is to change his diapers and to live by good values.
 
We want to teach him that nothing is true and everything learns. That it is good to question and to examine. Yes, and above all, that it is good to create. We also want to teach him that it is good to overcome, just as all life overcomes. We also want to teach him that he can be aware of reality, just as he can be aware of a dream.
 
But the most important thing is to teach him that he should not only think from today to tomorrow, but in generations. He too will have children one day, and we want these to carry on our values.
 
At ULTANIO, we look forward to this task and now invite all parents to join us in caring for the well-being of our children!


[[Category: Think Tank]]
[[Category: Think Tank]]
[[Category: Blog]]
[[Category: Blog]]